5 product priorities come from INMA Product Advisory Council

By Jodie Hopperton


Los Angeles, California, United States


Hi there. As I mentioned in my last newsletter, we’ve quietly set up an advisory council of product leaders from around the globe to help shape the initiative. In this newsletter, I want to tell you a little more about them and some of the areas they are focused on. 

Thanks for joining me on this product journey. I’m looking forward to continuing it with you in 2022.

All the best, Jodie.

The Product Advisory Council and their biggest learnings

This year I asked some product leaders from around the world to form an advisory council for the product initiative. This advisory council gives us access to their depth of experience, ongoing learnings, what they are looking to solve, and what’s on their mind at any given time.

You may not specifically know it, but you’ve already learned a lot from them through the output of the Product Initiative, such as the blog posts and virtual event programming. 

Recently I asked them what they had focused on and learnt this year. Before we go into these, let me introduce the group to you:

Members of the INMA Product Advisory Council.
Members of the INMA Product Advisory Council.

1. Organisation structure and goal setting/OKRs are “works in progress.”

The move to product-driven organisations is far from complete. Most organisations see the need to create multi-disciplinary teams, but it’s a big change to make. One council member cited the “turbulence of shifting the organisation and culture to OKR/cross-functional pod structure” as a key focus area for 2021. And it takes time to not only make the change but to build trust within and between departments. 

OKRs (objectives and key results) are a popular form of goal setting and tie into organisational structure. As product works across departments and has a need to understand stakeholder goals, it’s often the product team that is pushing and advancing the discussion. Within large companies, it’s a challenge to get these frameworks to tie into each other across brands, markets, and central disciplines. 

2. We’re still catching up on tech debt, which affects our ability to deliver quickly.

Many companies are still in the midst of combining technologies, migrating systems, and moving to homegrown stacks. As we develop our capabilities and look at new products and services, there is a constant need to evaluate what we build and what we buy.

Julian Delany told us: “There are moments when partnering with a specialist tech or SaaS provider will enable an increase in velocity, however holding internal IP on how, what, or why consumer benefits will come from the partnership is key.” 

Having resources tied up in these projects affects our ability to ship new products and that affects time to market. As product people, we want to get things out quickly. It’s not just a desire though. We’re finding that it’s actually a consumer expectation. 

That said, not everything has to be perfect before it ships. John Kundart told me a big lesson for his team has been that “experimentation through shipping MVPs can not be underestimated” and that previously they had “over-indexed on seeking certainty of any opportunity. We got stuck in ‘let’s learn everything before we ship’ at the cost of ‘let’s ship something (MVP) to learn about our customers.’” 

3. Solving for the discovery and consumption of content. 

Our job as product people is to create a content experience that delights users. That means a constant focus on improving discovery to enable readers to get to the journalism that’s relevant to them quickly and easily. Here are some of the ways the advisory council is looking at this:

  • Performance improvements.

  • Design, dynamic navigation, and opportunities for recirculation.

  • New concepts for users/cohorts based on qualitative and quantitative insights.

  • Text to speech/and narrated articles as a new way of consuming content.

It’s also been pointed out that the impacts of streaming (such as Netflix, Spotify, Amazon Prime effects) are becoming a more prevalent dictator on how consumers engage and discover content.

4. We need to look outside the industry.

Sometimes we have “mind meld” as an industry, which is not conducive to innovation or necessarily meeting readers’ needs. There are a number of ways to go outside the industry — including market research and talking to outside experts — and we shouldn’t underestimate the value of hiring from outside the industry.

We don’t always need the industry knowledge. Sometimes the skill sets are more valuable. The New York Times also made a point of this at the INMA World Congress, explaining that they hired gaming experts to help with engagement. The counter is that we can’t continually hire new people so how do we ensure the “novelty doesn’t wear off?”

Related to this topic, Kara Chiles recommends reading Think Again as a good reminder to test one’s expertise.

5. The continuing move to registrations and subscriptions.

In a cookieless world, many brands are pushing for registration as part of the funnel. And newsletters continue to be a large driver for registrations. How do we manage reach v exclusivity? This is an audience question as well as a content and feature-set question as we look at different products for different audiences. And Karl Oskar Teinen has been looking at how to solve “the bad conscience problem” by enabling users to step down to a smaller subscription product. 

To go deeper on registrations and subscriptions, check out INMA’s Readers First initiative

Date for the diary: Awards entries due January 28, 2022

I’ve been privileged to learn about many of the incredible news products that you have all been building over the past year. Even just in the last few weeks in the INMA Master Class, we’ve learned about Newscorp Australia’s Project Bob, how Schibsted solved user needs through new products, and gamification of The Straits Times’ reading experience. Now it’s time to show them off! Be sure to enter your best work of the year at the INMA Awards

Recommended reading

I enjoy Nieman Lab’s prediction pieces at the end of the year. Here are my top four that I think product folk will enjoy:

  • Paul Cheung: Business Infrastructure not business models tells us: “Build products and not models: It’s no secret that traditional revenue sources in journalism are becoming less dependable. There’s an urgent need for news organisations to diversify those sources.” More here
  • Cindy Royal: All these new products won’t manage themselves. More here
  • Mario Gracia: Linking content and format will be key. More here.
  • Sam Guzik: Better paywalls won’t save us from what’s coming. More here.

About this newsletter 

Today’s newsletter is written by Jodie Hopperton, based in Los Angeles and lead for the INMA Product Initiative. Jodie will share research, case studies, and thought leadership on the topic of global news media product.

This newsletter is a public face of the Product Initiative by INMA, outlined here. E-mail Jodie at jodie.hopperton@inma.org with thoughts, suggestions, and questions. Sign up to our Slack channel.

About Jodie Hopperton

By continuing to browse or by clicking “ACCEPT,” you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance your site experience. To learn more about how we use cookies, please see our privacy policy.