Shrinking budgets, tighter deadlines, and a content-hungry audience are not new problems. What is new is how quickly AI tools are becoming essential infrastructure for meeting those challenges.

Across the industry the mandate is clear: Do more with less while protecting quality and trust. A few short years back, this was an impossible task. Today it is far less daunting thanks to assistive AI.

Adoption is deepening fast

WAN-IFRA’s latest research found 75% of publishers now report efficiency gains from AI, 64% see improved content production, and 55% cite faster publishing times, even as only 9% can point to direct revenue impact so far.

A separate WAN-IFRA survey showed 49% of publishers are “just starting to use AI,” only 8% have not adopted it at all, and just 13% describe their use as advanced.

The biggest hurdles remain technical talent, editorial controls, and legal concerns, but the trajectory is clear: AI has moved from pilot projects to practical applications across workflows and audience tools.

The first wins appear in the unglamourous corners of the workflow. Transcription and tagging now turn raw audio or video into searchable assets within minutes. Smart clip generation makes it possible to publish highlights from a live event while the story is still unfolding. Even assisted drafting and SEO suggestions help reporters focus more on reporting and less on formatting.

These are no longer experiments. They are baseline productivity tools freeing up human attention for the work only people can do. Sports media offers a glimpse of the potential: Companies such as Nota can now create real-time highlights automatically for sports.

Discovery is changing just as quickly

Generative search and AI overviews are already reshaping how audiences find news, and they demand a different kind of optimisation. The 2025 Reuters Digital News Report showed 7% of people already use chatbots weekly for news, rising to 15% among those younger than 25. At the same time, Pew Research found that, when an AI summary appears in Google search results, users are less likely to click any link at all, and only about 1% of visits result in a click on a link inside the summary.

Answer engine optimisation (AEO) is basically search engine optimisation (SEO) for AI models. No one seems to agree on what to call it yet: AI optimisation (AIO), AEO, or something else. Pick your acronym, but I’m going with AEO. The goal is to make sure your journalism is the authoritative answer when someone asks a question in a conversational AI. That requires content machines can read and trust.

Stories need clean meta-data and clear schema so large-language models can easily parse and feature the work. Concise, well-labelled summaries help AI overviews pull accurate context and drive traffic back to the source instead of a generic snippet. Just as important is depth and originality. Google’s recent updates reward reporting with expertise and local relevance, while thin, AI-only content is more likely to be demoted.

The lesson is simple: Structure for discovery and double down on unique insight and community perspective by grounding your content in local information and perspectives.

AI is no longer a side experiment

It has become the backbone of newsroom infrastructure. The formula is simple: Automate the repetitive, structure content so machines and people can find it, and invest in originality, expertise, and local voice. Those who embrace this playbook will thrive in an environment where resources are tight and audience expectations keep rising.

Storytelling matters now more than ever, and with the right tools, you can tell that story to more people in more formats than at any time in history.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .