the earl blog

blog detail << the earl blog << blogs
The Earl Blog


Memo to publishers: show advertisers that newspapers work by practicing what you preach

Posted at 05:51 PM - 17 August 2009

It's not difficult to understand the irony of an industry that suggests its advertisers spend 5% of their revenues on marketing themselves in the pages of newspapers that, themselves, are marketed with often only one-third of the firepower.

In short, newspapers don't practice what they preach when it comes to marketing.

This is a shame because marketing works. And there's plenty of evidence to support it – especially during recessions.

One of the best resources for marketing knowledge is the Strategic Planning Institute in the United States, which maintains a database of more than 3,000 strategic experiences dating back more than 40 years. PIMS (Profit Impact of Market Strategy) measures the relationship between business actions and business results.

Simon McDonald, research manager of the Financial Times, drew from this database in a recent conference speech to draw a correlation between “share of voice” and “perception of quality” for products by consumers. In short, “the higher the share of voice, the better the quality perception of the product.”

For those needing a translation: Quality perception is the leading factor affecting profitability. The better share of voice, the higher perceived quality of the product or service. It's not so important that the amount of money spent, but rather what is spent versus the competition.

McDonald gave the example of BMW and its record of profitability, market share, and premium pricing over the past quarter century in the United Kingdom.

“Last year, BMW, Mercedes, Lexus and Land Rover were all spending roughly the same amount of advertising their cars, a little behind the Audi spend who had the largest share of voice at around 23% of the market,” McDonald said. “The downturn hits and all brands, with the notable exception of BMW, cut back on advertising by 10%. Now, without spending a single pound more, BMW is on par with Audi with respect to share of voice, and pulled ahead of three of their other big competitors.”

What if BMW had been more “courageous” and increased their marketing spend by 10%? They would have the largest share of voice in the luxury car market. If they had increased their spend 10% two consecutive years, they would have been “top of mind” position in the heads of car purchasers. And if they market themselves properly, they should shift market share during this recession.

Why does any of this matter?

Because recessions are opportunities for the courageous. It's a message newspapers are (or should be) pushing among its house accounts during today's downturn.

McDonald describes a “virtuous circle” involving share of voice and a company's success. High share of voice directly impacts perceived quality, which improves brand image, which can be used to grow market share, which should allow a company to premium price, have economies of scale, and increase profitability.

Yet the Financial Times researcher goes further. He points to a McGraw Hill study of companies in the U.S. recessions of 1974-75 and 1981-82 that “showed that those companies which aggressively increased their marketing budgets during the downturn reported back a significant increase in sales two and four years after the downturn finished.”

Said McDonald: “Four years after the 1981-82 recession, those who had increased their advertising budgets during the downturn reported sales growth of 2.5 times greater than those who did not maintain their advertising budgets.”

In fact, beware of the delayed effects of cutting marketing budgets. McDonald said that because marketing often doesn't pay for itself in the first year, cutting marketing may increase profits in the short-term. Yet citing studies by Biel, Hillier and the PIMS database, McDonald concludes that “in the longer term it can be demonstrated that those who increase or maintain adspend during recession will emerge more profitably and with larger market share.”

This sort of message needs to be fed to our advertising sales representatives. And this sort of budget needs to be fed to our own marketing departments. Let's practice what we preach.


print article e-mail to friend Submit to LinkedIn Submit to Digg



Latest Comments    3


It's not in my budget
Kent Ford - 24 August, 2009
Newspapers rely on local business people to advertise regularly, yet they won't even put house ads for subscriptions or to promote advertising in their publications. What kind of message does that send?
It says, "You need to tell local consumers about what you have to offer, but I don't need to, even though the cost to me is space. Everybody already know who we are and what we do."
My reaction to that as a local business person would be, "If advertising in your newspaper isn't worth it for you, the owner of the newspaper, it's not worth it for me. Don't bother me any more about it."


Agree completely
Randy Novak - 18 August, 2009
It is amazing to me that an industry that stresses the value of advertising to its customers invests so little on its own behalf; and leaves the "marketing" to its editorial staff which reports nothng but circulation declines. No wonder the industry is facing an identity crisis. Most Publishers view marketing as an expense not an investment, as the large number of unemployed newspaper marketing directors can attest.


Got a cite?
Mike Donatello - 18 August, 2009
Hi Earl,

Do you have a source for the McDonald presentation or, better yet, a copy that you can share?


Click below for the new Newsmedia Outlook report for 2010

Newsmedia Outlook 2010



About Earl

Earl J. Wilkinson is executive director and CEO of INMA. In his interactions with INMA members worldwide, Earl has one of the broadest views of newspapers of anyone serving our industry today. He is a trendspotter and a leading advocate for cultural change, transformation, and innovation. This blog represents his unique view of the emerging global newsmedia industry.

Biography | INMA profile



Contact Earl

Click here to message Earl



Subscribe

RSS feed
E-newsletter



Blog archives

August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009



Find Earl on the following social networks

Earl on Facebook
Earl on Twitter
Earl on LinkedIn
Earl on YouTube



Earl's preferred bloggers

Biz Blog
Fitz & Jen
Garcia Media Blog
Greenslade Blog
Meadows-Klue on Media
The Media Business
themediamanager
Rebuilding Media
Reflections of a Newsosaur
Romenesko
Innovations in Newspapers
yelvington.com



Earl's Twitter updates

    more tweets

    Join INMA Today

    Join INMA Today

    3 ways to join INMA: register for an e-newsletter and headlines, become an individual member, or sign up for a corporate membership (unlimited employees) Sign up now

     
    The Latest
    E-mail coupon deals are a win-win for advertisers, readers
    02 September 2010 | Ideas Magazine | Written by Paul Jewell | The Commercial Appeal
    Hey newspapers: CRM is a dirty word
    31 August 2010 | Ideas Magazine | Written by Roger Dunbar | The Globe and Mail
    Go to Australia to learn what's right about the news-on-paper environment
    30 August 2010 | Blogs | Posted by Earl J. Wilkinson | The Earl Blog
    Transforming and thriving: why our most loyal customers want us to change
    29 August 2010 | Blogs | Posted by Don Oldham | Audiencentricity Blog

    View All Latest

    ©2010 INMA | Home | About | Contact | RSS | Privacy | Sitemap

    Site by Drawbackwards